The main idea of the chapter is
what the title states. The role of ideology in the discussion of media. Croteau
first explains what ideology is in terms of the media. It is not so much about
defining an image, and comparing that image to real life, because real life is
a subjective term.
The section of Croteau’s writing that
really connected with me was when he discusses how the media can be used as an
agent of control. Croteau suggests that one of reasons that the media might
actually be able to create the dominant ideology is because the media presents
ideas as ‘normal.’ This happens, in part, because despite the wide variety of
media (television shows, movies, video games, social networking and so forth)
what those popular medias present is a fairly narrow ideal. The other part of
this normalizing is about those who use the media, especially the social net
working sites, to bring to attention to moral behavior that they deem
inappropriate, or ‘unnatural.’ This process serves not only define what is the
appropriate mode of living, but it also creates the process by which society can
be ruled. Croteau refers to this as hegemony. Croteau reminds his readers that
this process of natural and obvious assumptions has been a ruling power over
society for a long time. This was what underlies racism, sexism and homophobia.
The media are places where ideas can be circulated as truth, and therefore leave
little room for other claims.
I see this happening
all the time on the different sites I go to online. The media is too often used
to further self serving opinions, as the only opinion. That simply isn’t true. Twitter,
facebook, they are all viewed as a way for teens to communicate with one
another in a way that is insignificant and even juvenile, however, it does not
stop any of those criticizers from participating in using those same websites. It
does not stop people from asserting their opinion as fact and abusing social
sites to do so. However, Croteau writes as if sexism and racism no longer
exist, and that the media is only used further opinions about homophobia. This is
not true. The non of these forms of thought have gone away, women and people of
color are still struggling to gain equality, alongside those who are struggling
to gain acceptance of their sexuality. An example of this abuse is the reaction
to women being allowed into active combat in the military. Something that
should be viewed as a great step forward toward equality has become a one liner
about there being a reason there are no women in the NFL. However it is not
lost on me that there are counterculture exist. Many blog sites allow teens to
put out their own opinions, that are often opposing popular thought. These teens
do not always agree with one another, or get along, but there is still an
option
Hi Becca! I enjoyed reading your blog post. I like that you emphasize in your last paragraph that (despite some assertions) sexism and racism still exist today (along with, of course and unfortunately, homophobia). It always irks me when people try to tell me that those aren't problems anymore (and, yes, people have told me that. :/ ...). Also, I liked the way you worded media being used as an "agent of control." Nice. :)
ReplyDeletei read your blog i agree with you on your last paragraph. I agree that we has a nation should do something about sexism and racism. We can teach teenagers how to teach children about these issues at school or at after school daycare and that home.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the point that you made "The media is too often used to further self serving opinions, as the only opinion." Sometimes they only want their opinion to matter. They put out opinions and facts and things that draw the viewer in to keep the viewer entertained. Sometimes they go overboard and do things and put things out there that in my opinion should not be seen.
ReplyDelete